The Office of Inspector General (OIG) and Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) use statistical sampling and extrapolation to evaluate compliance and identify overpayments. Healthcare providers and organizations must be aware of these processes to protect their interests and ensure accurate billing practices.
The team at Safe Harbor Group will help you understand the conditions under which sampling and extrapolation are required, the different phases of the process, and how to navigate these challenges while potentially lowering penalties and overpayment demands. With over 200 years of combined experience, you can trust that we have your best interests in mind.

Table of Contents
Click the topic you are interested in to view more information.
Section 1: Chapter 8 of the Program Integrity Manual (PIM)
Sampling and Extrapolation Requirements
Section 2: Phases of Sampling & Extrapolation
Selecting a Statistically Relevant Sample
Reviewing Files
Properly Extrapolating the Findings
Section 4: Safe Harbor Group’s Role in Reducing Penalties and Overpayment Demands
Sample Selection
Medical Record Review
Extrapolation
Audit Support
Section 1: Chapter 8 of the Program Integrity Manual (PIM)
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) have laid out the guidelines for sampling and extrapolation in Chapter 8 of the Program Integrity Manual (PIM). This chapter details the requirements for the OIG and MACs to apply these methods during audits, investigations, and other reviews.
Sampling and Extrapolation Requirements
According to Chapter 8 of the PIM, sampling and extrapolation may be employed when:
- The provider or supplier has a sustained or high level of payment error.
- The provider or supplier fails to respond to requests for documentation in a timely manner.
- The MAC’s educational intervention does not result in a significant reduction in the provider’s or supplier’s error rate.
In these cases, the OIG and MACs can use statistical sampling and extrapolation to estimate overpayments and assess penalties.
Section 2: Phases of Sampling and Extrapolation
The process of sampling and extrapolation can be broken down into three primary phases:
Phase 1: Selecting a Statistically Relevant Sample
The first phase involves selecting a statistically relevant sample of claims or other data to analyze. The sample should be representative of the population under review and large enough to draw accurate conclusions. The OIG and MACs must ensure the sample is random and unbiased to minimize the potential for skewed results.
Phase 2: Reviewing Files to Determine the Error Rate
Once a sample has been selected, the OIG and MACs will review the individual files to identify any errors, discrepancies, or noncompliance issues. This phase involves a thorough examination of the documentation and comparison of the claims or data with the relevant billing and coding guidelines. The error rate is then calculated as the number of incorrect or noncompliant items in the sample divided by the total number of items.
Phase 3: Properly Extrapolating the Findings
The final phase involves extrapolating the findings from the sample to the larger population of claims or data. This process allows the OIG and MACs to estimate the total overpayment amount and assess penalties based on the error rate found in the sample. It is crucial that the extrapolation process is accurate and reliable, ensuring that the results are representative of the broader population.
Section 3: The Importance of a Private Sample
If a healthcare provider or organization believes that the OIG or MACs have used improper sampling or extrapolation methods, they have the right to present their own sample as a rebuttal. This private sample must be conducted by qualified professionals, such as data scientists and medical record reviewers, who can accurately assess the documentation and calculate an error rate.
By using a private sample, providers can demonstrate that the OIG or MACs’ findings are flawed or biased, thereby lowering penalties and overpayment demands. In some cases, the private sample may reveal a significantly lower error rate, which can have a substantial impact on the outcome of the audit or investigation.
Section 4: Safe Harbor Group’s Role in Reducing Penalties and Overpayment Demands
SHG offers a team of experienced data scientists and medical record reviewers who can help healthcare providers and organizations navigate the challenges of statistical sampling and extrapolation. By leveraging our expertise, you can ensure that your private sample is accurate, reliable, and compliant with the relevant guidelines.
Sample Selection
Our data scientists use sophisticated techniques to ensure that your private sample is random, unbiased, and statistically relevant. This ensures that the results accurately represent the larger population of claims or data.
Medical Record Review
Our medical record reviewers are well-versed in the latest billing and coding guidelines, ensuring that your documentation is thoroughly and accurately assessed. This helps to identify any errors or discrepancies and calculate an accurate error rate.
Extrapolation
With expertise in statistical analysis, our team can properly extrapolate the findings from your private sample to the larger population, potentially revealing a lower error rate than the OIG or MACs’ initial findings.
Audit Support
In addition to providing a private sample, our team can also assist you throughout the audit or investigation process, offering guidance, support, and expert advice to help you navigate the complexities of the healthcare system.
Why Choose Safe Harbor Group for Help With Statistical Sampling in Detroit?
Statistical sampling and extrapolation are powerful tools used by the OIG and MACs to assess compliance and identify overpayments in the healthcare industry. By understanding the guidelines laid out in Chapter 8 of the Program Integrity Manual and the phases of the sampling and extrapolation process, healthcare providers and organizations can better protect their interests and ensure accurate billing practices.
When faced with an audit or investigation, it is essential to consider the benefits of leveraging a private sample to rebut improper sampling and extrapolation methods. Safe Harbor offers the expertise of data scientists and medical record reviewers to help you navigate these challenges and potentially reduce penalties and overpayment demands.
Discuss Your Situation Today
In partnering with Safe Harbor Group, you can confidently navigate the complex world of healthcare compliance and protect your organization’s financial interests. For more information about our services and how we can assist you, contact our team today.